A bad interview doesn't always mean a bad candidate.


 A bad interview doesn't always mean a bad candidate.


Some people are excellent at explaining their value in a high-pressure conversation.
Others are excellent at doing the job.

Some people can do both. But most are stronger at one than the other.
You don't interview as often as you work, and speaking to the work and speaking to an interview are two different things. One you practice daily. Then the other you might do once every few years.

Interviews reward quick answers, polished stories, and on-demand confidence. The work itself demands patience, judgment, consistency, and abilities you only see over time.
So someone can walk out of a room knowing they were better than what they presented.
Credentials on paper. Years in the work. None of it showed.
That's not being unqualified. That's being bad at a format.
If that's ever been you, you're not alone. Everyone has had an interview they couldn't get past.

A bad interview can still be a tool.

Use the questions you couldn't answer to prepare for your next interview.
Write them down.
Connect them to what you've actually done.
Interview preparation: Practice with someone who offers this service.

Remember, the next interview isn't the same interview.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Knowing the Standard Isn't Knowing Why

Image
  Knowing the Standard Isn't Knowing Why You can recite every standard by heart and still not understand what it's protecting. The people who memorized the rulebook and the people who understand the reasoning behind it look identical right up until something happens that doesn't fit the script. One adapts. One freezes. Knowing the standard tells you what to do. Knowing why tells you what to do when the standard doesn't cover the situation in front of you.  The most valuable person in the room isn't the one who knows the most rules. It's the one who understands what the rules were trying to prevent.  Has a standard ever saved you from something the textbook didn't cover?
Read more

Afraid someone will be threatened by what you bring, or that you're just too qualified for the role.

Image
 Afraid someone will be threatened by what you bring, or that you're just too qualified for the role. You thought about taking credentials off your resume to get yourself through the door. You worked hard for what you have, and it shows. Present yourself as you are and be proud of what you've accomplished. You're not overqualified, and if someone feels threatened by what you bring, they were never going to let you in anyway.  Shrinking yourself doesn't open doors; it just makes you easier to overlook. The person you want to work for sees your credentials and says, "I want this person on my team." What credentials have you been tempted to take off your resume?
Read more

Competency is checked once and then forgotten.

Image
 Competency is checked once and then forgotten. Competency is often evaluated just once and then ignored. Most organizations check off training in the first year, file the certificate, and rarely revisit it. Then they run annual online training and call it "competency," but clicking through a module isn't the same as watching someone do the work today.  The problem is clear: skills decline over time, systems and regulations change, and individuals may shift roles. A person deemed competent on day one might not be competent by day three hundred, and paperwork won’t indicate this. Competency should not be a one-time event; it requires ongoing assessment. It should reflect actual performance and be re-evaluated as work evolves. Compliance failures are subtle; they happen when everyone assumes the last check still counts. So, if you pulled the competency records for a critical role in your organization today, how old would the most recent one be? 
Read more