Time Served:


 Time Served:

When you promote based on time served, what are you actually buying your organization? 
If a candidate has spent twenty years in one facility, are you confident they are current on standards, technology, and external benchmarks—or are they simply fluent in “how we do it here”? Does this promotion move your department toward where the field is going, or lock in habits from ten or twenty years ago? 
Would your patients and staff be better served by adding someone who has worked in multiple facilities, stayed current on standards, traveled, and can bring in a wider view—and then pairing them with your long‑term staff as mentors and successors? When the main argument for a leader is “they’ve been here a long time and know how we run things,” are you protecting the organization, innovation, or choosing the quickest fix? 
Time served will always matter. The basic question is: does it equal readiness for leadership in the department you need today?
Time served is not a qualification by itself. When you promote someone based on years in the building without asking whether that person is current and able to move the work forward, you're betting your facility on familiarity rather than readiness. This question is not 'Is this person loyal?' It's 'Have we really checked whether this choice will help or hurt the organization over time?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Admitting a mistake doesn't make you look incompetent.

Speed isn't Efficient

Afraid someone will be threatened by what you bring, or that you're just too qualified for the role.